I am Joe’s Autofocus

After tonight’s holiday shopping hell, I found myself at Barnes & Noble, trolling the periodicals for this month’s additions to my tear sheet collection. I’m probably the only photographer I know who has work appearing simultaneously in Outdoor Life Magazine and The Hockey News.

Et cetera, et cetera.

My only official deed of the day was a private function for the Spurs that went over well. I love it when big clients are satisfied. It’s the mark of a good day.

Now, on to the meat.

I reminded myself today of a conversation I had a couple years ago with a local newspaper shooter while we were both on the floor at a WNBA game. As a Nikon shooter who was thinking of switching to Canon, he asked me what I thought about the AF on my Mark II.

Marie FerdinandI said that even though it was fantastic, like all other AF systems it still had it’s faults, such as needing a little more time to think when faced with low-contrast situations. I used, as an example, the player who had just run under the net at full speed, directly at us. I said that quickly focusing on her face in that situation was nigh impossible, considering the low contrast of the scene coupled with the drastic falloff of the ambient light under the basket.

He said that would never do, and he would probably wait to switch, which made me wonder just what in the world he was expecting out of the new Canon digitals. I’ve known this guy for quite some time, and I know him not only to be a really cool guy, but also a good shooter, so it got me thinking about what people really expect out of their modern cameras.

Slip n SlideAutofocus is a tool, with its pros and cons, just like any other. It’s designed to help you do your job, not to do your job for you. You still have to learn how your camera behaves, and use your mighty human brain to anticipate the scene. For example, when you are shooting in less than favorable conditions in AI Servo mode, you have to give your camera more time to think before you fire.

Dalma IvanyiWhen shooting in dingy basketball light, for example, you can’t just hit the button quickly and expect the AF to instantly track. You have to keep the button down, tracking your subject and giving the AF processor time to predict the path of your subject, because that’s how servo mode works. It’s predictive autofocus. It uses data it collects to predict where the subject will be when the shutter is tripped. If it has no data to average, then your focus is less likely to be spot-on when you fire.

Now, if you’re shooting in bright sunlight, with a nice fast lens, then yeah, you can pretty much hit the button and expect the AF to be dead-on. Good AF depends on light and contrast. Cut down on those two things and you have to help it out as best you can.

The new digitals are great, but they can’t shoot for you. You still need to be a photographer.



~ by peakaction on December 20, 2006.

4 Responses to “I am Joe’s Autofocus”

  1. Amen, brotha. It’s a shame that some people want the technology to do all the work for them nowadays. Even more of a shame if they don’t know how to do it themselves if the technology fails.

    Keep kickin ass…

  2. Thanks mate… DA – fighting lazy photography since 1991.

    This entry was originally about three times longer than the final draft, but at the eleventh hour I decided to be merciful and spare my readers – all three of them – the pain of having to wade through my rantings in order to get to the good bits.

    I think if more digital photographers had gone to the trouble of at least experiencing manual focus film bodies, instead of just their lightning-fast digitals, more would have an understanding of what it means to truly be a professional photographer.

    To them, I say try shooting an indoor football game with a manual-focus 300/2.8, wide-open. Just try it. They’d be crying for their “90% accurate AF” in no time.

    See, there I go ranting again.

  3. Good post. It’s amazing how many people wants the camera to do all the business for them. A camera is a tool that HELPS you at your job. What makes good pictures besides having a good eye and be able to predict what’s going to happen next, is to know your camera just like you wrote.

    People have an idea (some do anyway) that if they just buy a 1D-series camera body they’ll shoot pulitzer prize winning photos..

    No doubt it’s a fantastic camera (I have two) and helps you quite a bit but you have to learn its limits and how to get the best out of it to be successful..

    My two cents anyway.

  4. There’s so many digital camera technology spread around does it mean its the end of conventional photography?

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: